Understanding Alternative Therapies for Autism: What Research Tells Us

A 2006 study published in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders examined how often families of autistic children use complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies compared to families of non-autistic children.

What the Study Found

Researchers compared 50 children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to 50 neurotypical children. They found:

• 52% of autism families had tried at least one CAM therapy, compared to 28% of control families.
• 70% of these therapies were biologically based, meaning special diets or supplements.
• 75% of parents in the ASD group felt the therapies they tried were beneficial.

Why This Matters

This research confirms what many autism parents already know: families frequently explore options beyond conventional medicine. The high reported satisfaction (75%) suggests these approaches may help some children, though the study didn't measure objective outcomes.

Practical Considerations

If you're considering CAM therapies:

• Focus on evidence: Biologically based therapies were most common in this study, but research varies on effectiveness.
• Track responses: Like the parents in this study, note any changes you observe.
• Consult professionals, especially for dietary changes or supplements that could interact with medications.

Study Limitations

This was a small study (50 ASD participants) from 2006. CAM options and autism research have evolved since then. Parent-reported benefits don't equal scientific proof, but they highlight real family experiences.

Original research: Patterns of complementary and alternative medical therapy use in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders (Published August 2, 2006)